A family blames Google for the death of their daughter: what is this story about?

Gonzalez against Google. The name of the case that the US Supreme Court examined on Tuesday pitted the family of a young woman murdered by the Islamic State against the internet platform, to which the girl’s mother and stepfather said they were not afraid: “We feel confident” .

“We feel very positive and just want justice, not just for our family, but for all families that have suffered a loss.”, said Beatriz González, Nohemi’s mother, after the oral hearing in Washington.

LOOK: Google plans to migrate the Calendar and Reminders apps to Tasks

His daughter was killed in the November 2015 attacks carried out by the Islamic State (IS) group in Paris, which killed a total of 130 people.

The lawsuit accuses Google of considering that, through Youtube, it allowed ISIL to post videos that incited violence and join the group, in addition to recommending recordings of the jihadists to its users through an algorithm that identified possible interested parties.

LOOK: To improve its accuracy: Google asks its employees to review the answers that Bard gives

The case examines for the first time the extent to which platforms can be held accountable for the recommendations their algorithms make of third-party material and could ultimately have the ability to change the current configuration of the internet.

But the plaintiffs are not afraid to take on the tech giant. “Si would have thought in fear we would not have been here, because we know that this can change social networks. Nohemi is going to be a change in all this”, José Hernández, the young woman’s stepfather, pointed out to the press.

LOOK: Susan Wojcicki steps down as YouTube CEO after nine years at the helm: what does it mean for content creators?

She had gone to study in the French capital and was the victim of the attack at the La Belle Équipe restaurant.

“I remember her with great pride, she was always moving, she was always moving forward. She was an independent, self-sufficient young woman. It was not fair that at the age of 23 she cut her life short”, said Beatriz, of Mexican origin.

In his opinion, a change is necessary: ​​“They are looking to change the way information moves so easily on social networks. It is very easy to make groups, share communication. It must be more monitored not only with terrorists, but with all kinds of criminal activities”.

Her husband agrees. The decision of the Supreme Court, with a conservative majority, will not be known for months, but the couple maintains the hope that when it arrives it will be “something good.”

LOOK: ChatGPT vs Google Bard: which of these two artificial intelligences is better?

“Let’s hope it changes everything, that’s why we come here, so that the Supreme Court can do justice to the pain we are going through. We are here for the change of social networks, so that they stop teaching everything that is terrorism. Unfortunately it is a very important case”added Hernandez.

In his sights is section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, passed in 1996, when the internet was in its infancy.

This regulation shields the platforms from lawsuits that treat them as responsible for the information provided by another source, but it is up in the air to determine if they can be blamed for their recommendations.

Source: Elcomercio

Callum

I have worked in the news industry for over 10 years. I have a vast amount of experience in writing and reporting. I have also worked as an author for a number of years, writing about technology and other topics.

I am a highly skilled and experienced journalist, with a keen eye for detail. I am also an excellent communicator, with superb writing skills. I am passionate about technology and its impact on our world. I am also very interested in current affairs and the latest news stories.

I am a hardworking and dedicated professional, who always strives to produce the best possible work. I am also a team player, who is always willing to help out others.