Why is it so difficult to train the Ukrainian pilots who will fly the American F-16 fighters?

The Western allies are ready to train pilots for the air forces of Ukraine in handling F-16 aircraft.

However, one important unknown remains: which countries will be willing to supply the US fighters, how many and when.

LOOK: Where else does the Wagner Group operate and what can happen to its activities outside of Russia after the rebellion

Shipment of F-16 fighter jets to Ukraine won’t be a quick fix or, in the words of the head of the Norwegian Air Force, a “panacea”.

Major General Rolf Folland believes it will take time for Ukraine to develop the ability to operate these Western jets with a complex weapons system.

We meet Folland at a large-scale Allied air exercise taking place in Norway, Finland and Sweden involving 150 fighter jets, far more than the entire Ukrainian Air Force.

The general says the practice is aimed at dominating the skies to prevent what he calls the kind of “old-fashioned” conflict currently taking place in Ukraine.

Three years to master an F-16

Winning air supremacy requires a level and sophistication that Ukraine at the moment cannot match. And even receiving a limited fleet of F-16s, it’s not clear that it will make it.

Perfect mastery of an F-16 can take years even for an expert pilot. (GETTY IMAGES).

Pulse, a Belgian pilot, it took him three years to master his F-16 fighter. He asks us to use his military pseudonym instead of his real name.

He shows us his F-16, an aircraft originally designed in the late 1970s, long before he was born.

“It flies like a dream,” he says. “But flying is the easiest part. The rest is harder.”

It refers to the long process of learning to operate the radar, sensors and weapons of the F-16.

Ukraine, which today has more pilots than planes, hopes to shorten that training to a few months.

Pulse sees it as logical to supply Western aircraft to Ukraine. He points to the weapons on his F-16: air-to-air missiles to destroy enemy aircraft and bombs to hit ground targets. “That’s important,” she says, “because you can use any NATO weapon with this plane.”

Expensive and risky maintenance

No less important is the issue of fighter maintenance.

The Norwegian Air Force, like others in Europe, has transitioned to the more modern F-35, so in theory it should have F-16s available for Ukraine.

At Orland Air Force Base, two of the oldest F-16s are used to train aeronautical engineers. That can take a year, or even more, for a senior aircraft technician.

“You can’t just hand over a fighter jet and say goodbye!” explains Col. Martin Tesli, the base commander and former F-16 pilot.

Maintenance is another concern over the supply of F-16s to Norway. (GETTY IMAGES).

It highlights that there are huge logistical requirements: spare parts, software and weapons. But he also understands the need to modernize the Ukrainian fleet of old Soviet-era jets.

“To a certain extent, if you don’t provide them with another type of aircraft, they won’t have an air force to defend themselves,” Tesli says.

According to Justin Bronk of the Royal United Services Institute, Ukraine would likely need the help of Western contractors to keep the F-16s flying. The obvious question is, which country is willing to accept the risks of deploying its own personnel on the ground?

professor bronk considers it more likely that Russia will target Ukrainian airbases if this country receives western planes. That’s a danger for the single-engine F-16, whose large air intake can suck up debris from the runway.

Would they be decisive in the war?

The above are good reasons why the US has resisted Ukraine’s pressure to provide F-16s for so long.

Rather than the fear of escalation, it is the practical aspects of operating and maintaining the aircraft that are important. The Pentagon has warned that it will be complex and expensive.

Many question whether the F-16 could be a decisive factor in the war in Ukraine. (GETTY IMAGES).

Nor is it considered likely that bringing Ukraine this resource would significantly alter the battle on the ground.

Lieutenant Colonel Neils Van Hussen, a former Royal Netherlands Air Force F-16 pilot, states that “a single weapons system will not change a great war”. He thinks the F-16s would just hit Ukraine “the ability to sustain what they are doing now.”

The reality of this war is that not even Russia, with its considerable air force, has been able to dominate the skies. Ground-based air defense systems are helping to prevent that from happening.

Providing Ukraine More air defenses will remain the West’s immediate priority. Rebuilding the country’s air force is a longer-term goal.

Jonathan Beale

Defense Correspondent, Norway

Source: Elcomercio