“Putting the responsibility on Quispe or Grimaldo does not seem responsible to me”: Journalists analyze the national team crisis in the preview of Peru vs. Argentina | DT SURVEY

In hours in which the fan tortures himself looking at the statistics and repeating at every moment that it is not possible not to have had a single shot on goal in 270 minutes played, Total Sport He spoke with six journalists who analyze the moment that everyone’s team is going through, trying to break down the coach’s decisions Juan Reynoso and they talk about the clash against the world champions.

Daniel Kanashiro – Direct TV

1. He failed at everything unfortunately. In the approach and the starting eleven, and also in the rethinking. Added to this, the individual performance of those selected makes this the worst game in years. There were no successes. It all went wrong because it was poorly implemented.

2. It is not the fact of being more or less offensive, it is that what you plan to apply is applied well and with the appropriate tools. Putting the responsibility of the team’s offensive production on Quispe or Grimaldo does not seem like a responsible solution to me. How many minutes of filming does Grimaldo have? Half an hour against Brazil, and Quispe? Going out to attack the world champion is playing Russian roulette. He defends like he did against Brazil, but he defends well. That is the point. One conclusion is that in 2 consecutive games both Brazil and Chile scored similar goals against us. Stopped ball at the near post and goal. We played defense and we defended badly. If we defended well we would be talking about a Peru with 3 points and the outlook would be different.

3. If it were just applying a personal best, everyone would have already done it and Messi would run the risk of not being the best in the world. It doesn’t go through there. He goes through being ordered and cutting off his supply.

John Virhuez – Journalist

1. He succeeded in neutralizing Chile’s offensive game until he made the changes in the second half. There he failed. The changes did not respond to him.

2. For me Grimaldo should play.

3. I wouldn’t make a personal mark on him, Argentina is not just Messi.

Virginia Siaden – Depor

1. Reynoso failed in tactical reading of the game, because Chile took advantage of defensive errors. Abram was lost, Zambrano, although it is true, in the first half he saved on several occasions, in the second half he made mistakes. Santamaría’s entry is a bit controversial because what he did at the end of the game, he discredited how well he entered, because in the end it influenced the second half. Basically, the tactical reading did not occur and did not even allow him to rethink for the second half, as if it happened in Paraguay. The changes were late and from the first half there were many errors. What did he get right? I would say with the entry of Bryan Reyna and Carrillo, but we must keep in mind that his level is no longer there when he was in Al Hilal, you can no longer demand as much from him and it makes a lot of sense that he entered in the second half, even so he knew generate situations. I think Reyna and Carrillo contributed something in the few minutes, they helped late, but they did it. It is the little that can be rescued.

2. To be more offensive you should see what players you have, Grimaldo and Reyna are very positive and know how to face, that was missing against Chile, they are ideal for them to enter. I have not seen fresh blood against Chile, we saw a match that tried to build a game from back to front, but it did not succeed. The defenders failed on many occasions. I don’t know if Quispe works from the start, but if for the second half, obviously, depending on how the others work, it would be appropriate for you to put fresh blood from the beginning because you need to face, the only thing that was seen was Reyna was facing twice against Chile. It is true that Paolo Guerrero continues to make a certain difference, but you cannot demand of him like the last Qualifier, the physical issue is no longer the same, so you need two or three players to put together plays for you and you have Paolo to attack or finish the play. For this reason, Guerrero is not being seen, because there is no link for him to finish completing the play. I think Bryan Reyna and Grimaldo would be good contributions from the start against Argentina.

3. It would be essential to make a personal mark on Messi, because he continues to make a difference, and the fact that he has not been there since the start against Paraguay does not diminish its importance. Even if it’s 10 minutes it will be dangerous if you don’t mark Messi, so it wouldn’t be bad. I would put someone to mark him without neglecting the rest of the defensive line, because the game is going to be complicated, even worse with the precedent against Chile.

Eddie Fleischmann – Willax Sports

1. In my opinion, Juan Reynosa fails in several things. Failure in the call, at the time of the call, in delaying the announcement of the call that comes from outside, in the excessive suspicion that distances the team from the fans, in the starting eleven putting Polo on the left when it is not his profile and leaving Bryan Reyna and André Carrillo from the starting eleven when they are the two most unbalanced players he has. Likewise, he is wrong, in the ultra-defensive approach and not having understood that this was the moment that could hurt Chile and try to win there, because he was not doing well either. He is wrong in his reading of the game, after the press conference, he is wrong in the fact that in three games of the Qualifiers Peru has not generated goal situations and not even a single free kick near the rival area.

2. Against Argentina, I would play with a defensive scheme, but with a little more ambition up front. Gallese; Sonne, Tapia, Callens, Trauco; Aquino, Cartagena, Yotún; Advíncula, Bryan Reyna and false ‘9’ André Carrillo, would not start with Guerrero.

Eduardo Castañeda – Diario Correo

1. It seems to me that he failed to put together a team basically to take care of what the rival attackers can do and not to design a team that could also worry the rival. And yet, the plan didn’t work out. Chile came to Peru when it wanted and how it wanted. But not everything is Reynoso’s responsibility. Outside of the proposal, there are repetitive individual errors and everything cannot be blamed on the coach. I don’t see anything redeemable from Reynoso on Thursday.

2 In fact, I think that Grimaldo or Reyna could give a different variant to the Peruvian attack. A change of pace and the daring to face and try to progress individually. Against Chile, Reyna and Carrillo gave Peru mobility. I am inclined to give at least one of them a chance to start. And as for Piero Quispe, I would think about having him as a replacement at least.

3. I wouldn’t make a personal mark on Messi. Although he is the great figure of Argentina, he has other very dangerous elements and I would not neglect any of them. It will involve being very attentive to the mark and not giving Messi too many spaces to any Argentine.

Irene Carranza – Peru Sports Magazine

1. I believe that there is more that went wrong than what was right. He again did not call Edison Flores or Christian Cueva for these games. If we look at the statistics we have only kicked three times in three games. Three games that we only dedicated ourselves to defending. A Peru afraid of the goal. There was no one to accompany Paolo, I think Reynoso reacts a little slowly when it comes to changes and when he touches him, he moves the board incorrectly. I still don’t see a clear game idea.

2. I think Grimaldo and/or Reyna fixed. The Cristal player knew how to measure up against Brazil (debut); Playing that way against the five-time champion, why not put him against the current world champion? On the other hand, Bryan Reyna already has a drop of experience in the national team. He has played 6 games and scored two goals. Against Chile he made the difference in the few minutes he was on the field. Peru had its moments of attack, of generating dangerous plays, but it was not enough. For me, he should be a starter. Quispe is a good card, but I don’t see him from the start, however, I would like him to play a few minutes.

3. Messi is a danger for any team, but I do not agree that a personal mark should be made for him. Today football is more direct, more dynamic. The only way to counter the big teams is to play them with good tactics, as equals, not by marking just one player. Football is collective, and the one who scores the most goals wins, not the one who defends the best.