US experts: Russian invasion of Ukraine is a strategic disaster, so far

The first days of the invasion of Ukraine by the Russian army is, according to American experts, a tactical and strategic error: food and fuel shortages, abandonment of armored vehicles, loss of aircraft and casualties among the troops.

SIGHT: A million people fled Ukraine in the first week of the war unleashed by Putin

Moscow has been accumulating setbacks in this first week of invasion because it underestimated the resistance capacity of the Ukrainians, but these setbacks could lead the Kremlin to deploy all its power and indiscriminately destroy much of the country, they warn.

Specialists in the Russian military say they have been surprised by the mismanagement of the campaign, with convoy columns bogged down, hundreds of Russian armored vehicles lost and the Kremlin’s air force neutralized by Ukrainian defenses.

• A Russian businessman living in the US offers a million dollars for Putin’s head
• Germany seizes the mega yacht of Russian oligarch Alisher Usmanov, alleged Putin figurehead
• “This illegal invasion is the sole responsibility of Putin, but NATO created the conditions for it to happen”

“When you screw everything up after two or three weeks, I can understand that,” said Scott Boston, a defense analyst at think tank Rand Corp. “But when you hit the threshold walking into the house, you have another problem.”

Pentagon and private-sector experts expected Russian President Vladimir Putin’s army to rapidly wipe out Ukraine’s missile defenses and air force, undermining the counterattack capacity of the 200,000-strong military command.

But none of this happened in the first seven days of attacks. And while there is no reliable estimate of the number of Russian soldiers killed, wounded, and captured, it appears to be much higher than expected for a well-prepared invasion.

– ‘Colossal intelligence failure’ –

“It was a colossal failure of intelligence, which grossly underestimated the Ukrainian resistance, and the military execution was appalling,” Michael Vickers, a former US deputy secretary of defense for intelligence, said this week.

“His main attack was insufficient. It was little by little. Their reconnaissance elements have been captured, the columns have been destroyed,” he added. “It’s just a mess.”

Military experts from the Atlantic Council’s Scowcroft Center said the Russians seized an airport near Kiev. But the intensity of the fighting damaged the facilities too much to be used, as the Kremlin wanted, in its attempt to invade the capital.

Furthermore, they added, “Russian aircraft and helicopter losses were surprisingly high and damaging,” as they were unable to destroy Ukrainian air defenses.

Another surprise was the limited and ineffective deployment of Russian electronic weaponry, which analysts expected would play a critical role in the attack on Ukrainian communications.

“If the Russians had succeeded in separating Ukrainian military leaders from those who receive their orders, the Ukrainian air and air defense forces would have been forced to fight in an uncoordinated manner, making them less lethal and more vulnerable to attack,” notes the Scowcroft Center report.

Boston notes that the Ukrainians have continued to use their Turkish Bayraktar drones to attack Russian forces. “If they get hit by Turkish drones once or twice, fine,” he says. But if they are “more than once or twice, something is wrong on the Russian side.”

For Pentagon spokesman John Kirby, the Russians appear not to have adequately coordinated “their considerable and diverse capabilities, nor managed the logistics of the invasion”.

– “Abandoned vehicles” –

“We have early indications that while they have sophisticated combined arms capabilities, they are not necessarily fully integrated,” he added.

Their logistical failures are also surprising: “We see abandoned vehicles. We see support issues, not just with fuel, but with food,” Kirby said Wednesday.

Boston, which has participated in high-level war games focused on Russian forces, said there are indications that many soldiers are young, insufficiently trained for this type of conflict and probably didn’t even know they were going to war.

However, none of the experts sees the Russians offside. His army’s advance has stalled, but that could solve his logistical problems, Kirby says.

Instead, the experts they fear that Putin’s frustration will lead him to use the full force of his artillery, missiles and air power on the Ukrainian population, which would have a devastating effect.

“Russia continues to have the advantage of overwhelming combat power that will eventually overwhelm Ukrainian forces as the war continues,” the Scowcroft Center report warns.

• Ukraine compares bombing of Kiev to that of Nazi Germany in 1941
• Ukraine reports the death of 2,800 Russian soldiers on the second day of the invasion
• Why did Russia invade Ukraine and what are Putin’s arguments for war?
• A shocking audio reveals how Russian soldiers threaten and then kill 13 Ukrainian soldiers on an island
• These are the countries that support Russia and those that are with Ukraine
• NATO activates its defense troops for the first time in history to deter Russia

Source: Elcomercio

Deshawn