After the right to abortion revoked, access to abortion pills threatened?

An earthquake that could have many aftershocks. As conservative US states rush to ban abortion after Friday’s Supreme Court ruling overturning this right at the federal level, the fight over abortion is already moving to another field: that of the pills. abortifacients.

Limited in what it can do, the Biden administration will focus on expanding access to these pills to women living in states where abortion is banned or severely restricted. But it is more than likely that some of these states, as well as powerful conservative groups, will go to court to try to ban their use.

“We can’t stop the abortion pills from circulating”

Hot on the heels of Friday’s high court announcement, the Democratic president asked health officials to make sure abortion pills are available to American women, saying he would do ‘everything in (his) power’ to protect the rights of women in states where they would be affected by the decision. The pills, which can be used up to 10 weeks pregnant in the United States, account for half of abortions in the country.

Demand is expected to increase further after a dozen states have banned or imposed draconian restrictions on abortion, and more are expected to follow. Rebecca Gomperts, a Dutch doctor whose organization provides abortion pills on the internet, believes that the situation is not as desperate as it was before the “Roe v. Wade” of 1973, which guaranteed the right to abortion everywhere in the country. “We can’t prevent abortion pills from circulating,” she told AFP. “So there is always access to safe abortion if a woman becomes pregnant unintentionally.” But it’s far from guaranteed, worry many abortion rights advocates.

Trips to other states?

The United States Medicines Agency, the FDA, approved the use of these pills about 20 years ago. Last year, she authorized their sending by mail. But in anti-abortion states, their use remains a legal gray area and will certainly be the subject of battles in court. On Sunday, South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem said medical abortions via telemedicine were “very dangerous medical procedures” and should only be done under medical supervision.

According to the Guttmacher Institute, a research center that campaigns for access to contraception and abortion worldwide, 19 American states require that abortion pills be administered by a member of the health care personnel, thus prohibiting their delivery by mail. And in states banning all methods of abortion, women could be prohibited from seeing doctors based in another state or abroad in teleconsultation. In this case, they would have to travel to another state where these appointments would be authorized and receive their envelope at an address outside their state.

Lawsuits approaching?

But the obstacles don’t stop there. A medical abortion is done in two stages: first with mifepristone then, 24 to 48 hours later, misoprostol to induce contractions. The question therefore arises: can a woman residing in an anti-abortion state be prosecuted if she receives the first dose elsewhere, but the second after returning home?

While progressive states take steps to make abortions easier for women in other parts of the country, conservative states may seek to sue health workers and groups involved in these efforts. And even the patients themselves. Anticipating such plans, Justice Minister Merrick Garland warned on Friday that states could not ban abortion pills since federal regulations prevail, suggesting a tussle in court.